Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6212 OF 2023 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to commit the Contemnor/3rd Respondent to the Hon'ble Court on his willful disobedience by showing scant respect towards orders dated 01.11.2023 passed in I.A.No.1/23 IN W.P.No.28581/23 on the file of this Honble Court in implementing them in its true letter and spirit and consequently punish him for his willful disobedience besides negligence in implementing orders dt 01.11.23 of the Hon'ble Court passed in I.A.No.1/23 IN W.P.No.28581/23 under the provisions of Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act Between: T.Nagendra Babu,S/o John,aged 35 years, Occ; Cultivation, R/o 4-93, Prathuru (V), Tadepalli (M), Guntur District. ...PETITIONER AND Sri Nagi Reddy, Tahsildar, Tadepalli Mandal ,Tadepalli,Guntur District.
...CONTEMNOR/3'^° RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P SUBASH The Court made the following ORDER ;
APHC010584302023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY JHE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6212/2023 Between: T.nagendra Babu ...PETITIONER AND if Sri Nagi Reddy Counsel for the Petitioner; ...CONTEMNOR 1.SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Contemnor:
1.P SUBASH The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 01.11.2023 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.P.No.28581 of 2023. On 15.10.2024, 18.11.2024 and 27.12.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent on counter submitted that after due enquiry it was noticed that there are no encroachments as alleged by the petitioner in the writ petition in Sy.No.220 of Gundimeda Village of Tadepalli
^•1 Mandal and to the said effect, an endorsement dated 04.12.2023 was also sent to the petitioner. In view of the same, nothing remains for adjudication and accordingly prayed to close the contempt. A perusal of the counter and the endorsement dated 04.12.2023 would indicate that there are no encroachments in Sy.No.220 as alleged by the petitioner and the contempt is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. Sri Nagi Reddy, Tahsildar, Tadepalli Mandal ,Tadepalli,Guntur District.
2. One CC to SRI. SRINIVASULU KURRA Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRI. P SUBASH Advocate [OPUC]
4. THREE CD COPIES SD TAC
HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2025 1
ORDER CC.No.6212 of 2023 ^ 2 8 MAR 2025 n . Current Section . Co CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE