Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35992 (ALL)

RAMA KANT v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/10965/2025 · 2025-04-04

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:48539 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 10965 of 2025 Applicant :- Rama Kant Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Subhash Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri Subhash Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Abhishek Tripathi, learned AGA for the State/opposite party no.1. 2. Though the application under Section 528 BNSS has been preferred by the applicant for quashing the Non-Bailable Warrant dated 3.4.2024 in Complaint Case No. 2725 of 2022 (Vishnu Dutt Mishra Vs. Rama Kant), under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, Police Station- Dhoomanganj, District Allahabad, pending before the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.16, Allahabad, District Allahabad but the learned counsel for the applicant has confined his relief only for a direction for consideration of the bail application with expedition. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant A.G.A. has no objection to the same. 4. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of while observing that in case appropriate proceeding in the form of bail application is preferred before the court below, then the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with the law of the land keeping in view the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51. Order Date :- 5.4.2025 piyush Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad