[2025:RJ-JP:2534] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 57/2025 1. Preeti Sharma D/o Mr. Kalyan Sahay Sharma W/o Jitendra Kumar Prajapat, Aged About 21 Years, R/o- Brahmano Ka Mohalla, Saiwar, Jamwaramgarh, Jaipur Rajasthan- Amer 302027, Rajasthan. 2. Jitendra Kumar Prajapat S/o Mr Rudmal Prajapat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o- Ward No 3, Khatiko Ka Mohalla Kalan, Chomu, Jaipur, 303806, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Department Of Home Affaires, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Jaipur. 3. S.h.o., Police Station Samod, District Jaipur. 4. Kalyan Sahay Sharma S/o Gyarsi Lal Sharma, Resident Of Brahmano Ka Mohalla, Saiwar, Jamwaramgarh, Jaipur. 5. Rakesh Sharma S/o Radheshyam Sharma, Resident Of Nai Ki Thadi, Chaoud Ke Mand Ramkaran Colony, Jaipur. 6. Kanaram Sharma S/o Kalyan Sahay Sharma, , Resident Of Saipura, Ramgarh Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Khushwant Morwal Mrs. Preeti Sharma with Mr. Jitendra Kumar(petitioners in person) For Respondents : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 17/01/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry are waived. 2. Petitioners are present in person and they have been duly identified by their counsel. [2025:RJ-JP:2534] (2 of 2) [CRLW-57/2025] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent(s) as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are major and have solemnized marriage on their own free will on 23.12.2024. Copy of marriage certificate dated 23.12.2024 has been annexed with the writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but family members and relatives who are respondent Nos.4 to 6 are not happy with their marriage. It is further submitted that the petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, therefore, they should be protected. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Jaipur and respondent No.2 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, and, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /573