RAMPAL DAHIYA v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANOTHER
CWP/10946/2025 · 2026-04-27
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3599 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3599 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-10946-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
252
CWP-10946-2025
Date of Decision: 27.04.2026
Rampal Dahiya .....Petitioner VERSUS Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present : Mr. A.S Virdi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Prince Singh with Ms. Navya Jindal, Advocates for the respondents.
**** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
1.
The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the transfer order of the petitioner dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-1). Further praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for allowing the petitioner to retain the present post in view of his request dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) or post him as SDO/Store Tohana in view of his representation dated 21.06.2024 (Annexure P-6) and 27.03.2025 (Annexure P-7) or alternatively allow him the earned leave preparatory to retirement to enable him to take treatment of his ailments and his daughter. Further praying for issuance of a writ in the PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.05.02 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CWP-10946-2025
nature of prohibition to stay the operation of the impugned transfer order of petitioner dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-1).
2.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous, inasmuch as the impugned order dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-1), which is the subject matter of challenge in the present petition, has been withdrawn vide order dated 10.06.2025. A copy of the said order has been produced before this Court and is taken on record as Mark ‘X’.
3.
In view of the aforesaid submission and the withdrawal of the impugned order, the present writ petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
4.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stands
disposed of.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
27.04.2026
Puneet Chawla
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. :
Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.05.02 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document