1 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.2255 of 2022 APHC010584702022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2255/2022 Between: 1. INABATHULA ANNAPURNA @ SAMPURNA, WIFE OF LATE KOTESWARA RAO,HINDU AGED ABOUT 47 EARS,PRIVATE EMPLOYEE,RESIDENT OF D.NO.77-7/1-22,NEAR G ATRI PUBLIC SCHOOL,PRAKASH NAGAR,PAYAKAPURAM,VIJAYAWADA-520015. 2. INABATHULA UMAMAHESWARERAO,, S/O KOTESWARA RAO,HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,PRIVATE EMPLOYEE,RESIDENT OF FIRE STATION ROAD,D.NO.77- 31/1-5,NARA ANJANEYULU ROAD, PRAKASH NAGAR, PAYAKAPURAM,VIJAYAWADA-520015. 3. INABATHULA SURESH,, S/O KOTESWARA RAO,HINDU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,PRIVATE EMPLOYEE,RESIDENT OF FIRE STATION ROAD,D.NO.77- 31/1-5,NARA ANJANEYULU ROAD, PRAKASH NAGAR, PAYAKAPURAM, VIJ AY AWADA-520015 . ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. CHOPPARA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/o Narasimha Rao, Hindu, Aged about 37 years, Advocate, Resident of D.No.30- 19/2,Ramaswamy Street,Karmikapuram,Vijayawada-2 2 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.2255 of 2022 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dt.21.10.2022 passed in E.A.N.O 43/2022 in E.P NO 121/2022 in 0.S.N.0.1761/2022 on the file of the Hon’ble II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the orders passed in un numbered F.A.N.O. 43/2022 dated 21.10.2022 in F.P No.121 of 2021 in O.S.No. 1761 of 2019 on the tile of the Hon’ble 11 Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada and pleased to enter into the EP schedule pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. REGULAGADDA VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P BADRINATH 3 TCDS,J C.R.P.No.2255 of 2022 The Court made the following order: When the matter was listed on 01.03.2023, there was no representation for the petitioners. Again, it was listed on 24.06.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. In that view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 17.07.2025 KGR