2025:HHC:36340 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.912 of 2019 Decided on: 30.10.2025 _________________________________________________________ Madan Singh & Others ...Petitioners Versus The State of H.P. & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. No For the petitioners: Mr. Bonit Thakur and Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocates vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Learned Vice Counsel for the petitioners on instructions of original counsel Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, as received from the petitioners, states that due to subsequent events coupled with the fact that admissible benefits stand released to the petitioners, the instant matter may be given a closure. [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the Learned State Counsel also. In above scenario, the instant petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:36340 - 2 - closed and pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 30, 2025 [Shivender]