SRI KRISHNA SAI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY AND ANOTHER v. TADALA (DUPPALAPUDI) DURGA AND ANOTHER
CMA/1229/2011 · 2025-07-31
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35982 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35982 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010583632011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1229/2011 Between:
1. SRI KRISHNA SAI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY AND ANOTHER, REP., BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CHALASANI VENKATESWARA RAO D.NO. 13-2-24/1, 1ST FLOOR, LATCHI RAJU STREET, KAKINADA.
2. DEVINENI RAMESH, S/O. SUBBA RAO D.NO. 13-2-24/1, 1ST FLOOR, LATCHI RAJU STREET, KAKINADA.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. TADALA DUPPALAPUDI DURGA AND ANOTHER, W/O. PRASAD CULTIVATION R/O. GANGANAPALLI, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL,
2. DUPPALAPUDI KASI VISWESWARUDU KASI VISWESWARA RAO, S/O. SURYANARAYANA CULTIVATION, R/O. GANGANAPALLI, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 2102 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order and decreetal order of the learned III Addl. District Judge, Kakinada passed in IA.No.1914/2011 in OS.No.85/2011 dated 24.10.2011 pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 693 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in CMAMP No. 2102 of 2011 in CMA NO. 1229 of 2011, dt. 2-3-2012 and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PARAVASTU KRISHNA The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
Sri G. Sravan Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri O. Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the appellants, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 01.08.2025 KAS