1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8385 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Kumar Kodopi S/o Mr. Bharat Singh Kodopi, Aged About 43 Years Post Teacher (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Upper Primary School, Pusawand, Block Kanker, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director, Public Instruction, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur 3 - The Collector And President District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker, C.G. 4 - District Education Officer, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker, C.G. 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sabyashachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 19/08/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 18/06/2025 (Annexure- P/2) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Middle School SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.20 10:27:10 +0530 2 Pusawand, Block Kanker, Dist- Uttar Bastar Kanker to Govt. Middle School Dodpal, Block Sukma, Dist- Sukma under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after declaring him surplus there. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika