Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35975 (PNJ)

GOURAV BAJAJ AND OTHERS v. VINOD KUMAR

CR/1669/2025 · 2025-03-20

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 Gourav Bajaj and others Vinod Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for setting aside the order dated (Annexure P the application seeking rejection of plaint was dismissed. to interfere in the matter, learne he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to the petitioner 20.03.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1669 Date of Decision: Gourav Bajaj and others Versus Vinod Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sholab Arora, Advocate for the petitioner (through Video Conferencing). NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the order dated (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned trial Court in CS/913/2022 whereby the application filed by the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of plaint was dismissed. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the pleas before Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. 25 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1669-2025 Date of Decision: 20.03.2025 .… Petitioners .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sholab Arora, Advocate for the petitioners (through Video Conferencing). Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the order dated 10.10.2024 the learned trial Court in CS/913/2022 whereby under Order VII Rule 11 CPC fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined d counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to raise all the pleas before the learned trial Court. with the liberty aforesaid. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the 10.10.2024 the learned trial Court in CS/913/2022 whereby under Order VII Rule 11 CPC fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined d counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.21 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.