Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35972 (BOM)

RUJUTA BALKRISHNA PARULEKAR, THR. HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY BALKRISHNA V. PARULEKAR v. MITHUN BRAHMANPALLI GOPINATH AND ANR

MCA/218/2025 · 2025-08-22

Shri Valmiki Menezes

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

914 MCA 218-2025 22nd August, 2025 Jose IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.218 OF 2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (MAIN) NO.6 OF 2025 RUJUTA BALKRISHNA PARULEKAR, THR. HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY BALKRISHNA V. PARULEKAR ... Applicants. Versus MITHUN BRAHMANPALLI GOPINATH AND ANR. ... Respondents. Mr. Abhijeet Kamat, Advocate for the Applicants. CORAM: VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED: 22nd August, 2025 P.C: 1. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 2. Registry to waive office objections and register the matter. 3. This is an application for correction of the order dated 05.08.2025 in MCAM No.6/2025. 4. Errors have occurred in para 2 of the order, where the words, “the Decree being sought to be confirmed in Bangalore” and “He seeks leave to withdraw this application and to file the same before the 2025:BHC-GOA:1592 914 MCA 218-2025 22nd August, 2025 appropriate Court” shall now read as, “the Decree being sought to be confirmed is a Decree passed by the Family Court in Bangalore” and “He seeks leave to withdraw this application and to file the same before the appropriate Forum”. 5. Necessary corrections to be carried out and the corrected order may be uploaded. 6. Application stands disposed of. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. Signed by: JOSE FRANCISCO DSOUZA Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 25/08/2025 10:10:44