IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18552 of 2025 Decided on: 1st December, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hari Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2 and 5. Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhry, learned Assistant Advocate General, Ms. Kiran Dhiman and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 & 5, respondent No.3 and respondent No.4, respectively. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Petitioner seeks applicability of Sunder Singh Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.2, Balo Devi & others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others3 and Baldev Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others4, as according to him, applicability of these decisions would make him entitled to pension. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 01, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 Civil Appeal No.6309 of 2017, decided on 08.03.2018 3 Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022, decided on 18.07.2022 4 CWP No.2711 of 2017, decided alongwith connected matter on 22.02.2022