APHC010578402018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 27625/2018 Between: BOMMIDI DHARMARAJU, S/O.LATE BANGARRAJU, HINDU, MALE, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-124, TOKATIPPA VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARSAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARSAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MOGALTUR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. BOMMIDI MARTHA RAJAMMA, W/O. LATE BANGARRAJU, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 61 YEARS, R/O.KONTHIWADA VILLAGE, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not considering petitioner's complaints dt.24.05.2018, 09.03.2018 against the unofficial respondent and her followers as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and Rules framed there under also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent police to protect the petitioner fish tanks from the unofficial respondent and her men by duly registering the petitioners reports as crime.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the matter is of civil nature and as such, the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. Hence, the petition may be disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27625 of 2018 Dt.16.07.2025 Dinesh