APHC010581572016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8351/2016 Between: 1. G.V.V.R. ANJANEYULU S/O.GANGA RAJU,, OCC: RETIRED SPECIAL CATEGORY ASSISTANT, R/O.#3-81/1, KORUKOLLU VILLAGE & POST, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM (H.O.), ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATION, REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order, orders or directions particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - i. declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not paying terminal benefits to the petitioner, which includes the share of the APCOB, DCCB and PACS and allowing him and his family to starvation and making him to handicap to reach bare necessities of his family including medical expenditure as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, contrary to the Clauses 6 & 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), dt.11-01-2013 and also violative of the order dt.21-12-2012 passed by this Hon'ble court in 2 WVMP No.4182 & 4470 of 2012 and WPMP No.26566 of 2011 in WP No.21807 of 2011 besides violative of Arts.14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India; and ii. consequently, direct the 1st respondent to pay all terminal benefits to the petitioner along with interest @18% per annum and also direct the 1st respondent to pay costs of this proceedings to the petitioner; IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 10582 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to pay all terminal benefits to the petitioner duly giving effect to the Clauses 6 & 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), dt.11-01-2013 and also in the light of the letter and spirit of the order dt.21-12-2012 passed by this Hon'ble court in WVMP No.4182 & 4470 of 2012 and WPMP No.26566 of 2011 in WP No.21807 of 2011 IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 13196 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondents as 3rd and 4th respondents in the cause title of W.P. No.8351 of 2016 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2016(WPMP 17731 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the main prayer in W.P. No.8351/2016 as "...to issue a writ or order, orders or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - i. declaring the action of the 1st and 3rd respondents in not paying terminal benefits to the petitioner, which includes the share of the APCOB, DCCB and PACS and allowing him and his family to starvation and making him to handicap to reach bare necessities of his family including medical expenditure as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, contrary to the Clauses 6 & 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), dt.11-01-2013 and also violative of the order dt.21-12-2012 passed by this Hon'ble court in WVMP No.4182 & 4470 of 2012 and WPMP No.26566 of 2011 in WP No.21807 of 2011 besides violative of Arts.14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India; and ii-.-- consequently, direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to pay all terminal benefits to the petitioner along with interest @18% per annum and also direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to pay costs of this proceedings to the petitioner; and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 17736 OF 2016 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 3rd respondents to pay all terminal benefits to the petitioner duly giving effect to the Clauses 6 & 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), dt.11-01-2013 and also in the light of the letter and spirit of the order dt.21-12-2012 passed by this Hon'ble court in WVMP No.4182 & 4470 of 2012 and WPMP No.26566 of 2011 in WP No.21807 of 2011 and pass IA NO: 8 OF 2016(WPMP 63064 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PEETA RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A RAJENDRA BABU 2. . 4 The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “ to issue a writ or order, orders or directions particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus- i. declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not paying terminal benefits to the petitioner, which includes the share of the APCOB, DCCB and PACS and allowing him and his family to starvation and making him to handicap to reach bare necessities of his family including medical expenditure as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, contrary to the Clauses 6 & 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), dt.11-01-2013 and also violative of the order dt.21.12.2012 passed by this Honble court in WVMP No.4182 & 4470 of 2012 and WPMP No.26566 of 2011 in WP No.21807 of 2011 besides violative of Arts. 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and ii. consequently direct the 1st respondent to pay all terminal benefits to the petitioner along with interest @18% per annum and also direct the 1st respondent to pay costs of this proceedings to the petitioner; and pass such other order or orders” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Sri Peeta Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner namely Sri G.V.V.R. Anjaneyulu, has expired and his legal representative/s are not in touch with him. 3. Per contra, Sri G. Krishna Kireeti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent-bank, had produced the written instructions vide DEV.Sapandana/2022-23, dated 16.08.2022, submitted by the 1st respondent-bank, before this Court. In these written instructions, it is stated that the 1st respondent-bank had already been paid the retirement benefits of Rs.1,54,000/- by way of a cheque, on 28.07.2022 and also paid the earned leave encashment and gratuity of Rs.2,03,332/- by way of cheques, on 16.08.2022, to the wife of the petitioner, namely Smt. Garakapati Lakshmi. 5 4. Sri Peeta Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner, has not disputed the above facts. 5. In view of the averments in the written instructions, dated 16.08.2022, of the 1st respondent- bank, produced by Sri G. Krishna Kireeti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent-bank, this Court is of the opinion that no further adjudication is required in this Writ Petition and the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 01.09.2025 BSM 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.8351 of 2016 01.09.2025 BSM