Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35957 (JHR)

SAHGUFTA ANJUM ALLIAS SHAGUFTA ANJUM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH C.I.D.

A.B.A./6582/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:34640 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 6582 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6582 of 2025 Sahgufta Anjum @ Shagufta Anjum, aged about 35 years, wife of Numan Ansari, resident of Village Murpa, P.O. & P.S. Balumath, District- Latehar (Jharkhand) … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand through C.I.D. … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. ----- 04/20.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with C.I.D. P.S. Case No.18 of 2025, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No.54 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, CID, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation is made against the petitioner for taking job on forged and fabricated documents. He further submits that the land in question was acquired by the CCL in the Piparwar colliery and the said land was verified by the Circle Officer, Tandwa and he has certified that the said land belongs to the ancestor of the petitioner and, thereafter, the petitioner has been appointed. He then submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case alleging that on the forged and fabricated documents, the job has been obtained. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of taking job on the forged and ( 2025:JHHC:34640 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 6582 of 2025 fabricated documents. 5. Page 38 is the report of the Circle Officer, Tandwa wherefrom it transpires that the said land is of the ancestor of the petitioner and the name of ancestor is mentioned as Lakshan Miyan at Serial No.4 in the said report and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender, she shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, CID, Ranchi in connection with C.I.D. P.S. Case No.18 of 2025, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No.54 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 20th November, 2025 Ajay/