120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1746-2025 Date of decision: 26.03.2025 Ram Kumar (since deceased) through his LRs ...Petitioner(s) Versus Pawan Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Sajan, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Girdhwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for an adjournment. No adjournment slip has been filed. 2. Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner(s) to revive the same when the petitioner(s) is ready to argue the matter. 3. In the application for revival, the petitioner(s) would also explain as to how the petitioner(s) is challenging the order (Annexure P-6) when as per the said order, the objection filed by one Sandeep, Sanjeet and Pardeep has been dismissed and not those of the petitioner(s). In the prayer clause, it has been stated that warrants of possession have been issued whereas a perusal of Annexure P-6 would show that no warrants of possession have been issued by the said order whereas the warrants of possession have been issued as per the order dated 15.02.2025 which is Annexure P-7 which order has not been challenged in the present revision petition. 26.03.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.03.26 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document