M/S SATYAM PRASAD BHANDAR AND OTHERS v. A.S. NARANG AND OTHERS
COPC/525/2024 · 2025-12-15
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35944 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35944 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:43695 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.525 of 2024 Decided on: 15.12.2025 M/s Satyam Prasad Bhandar & others … Petitioners Versus Sh. A.S. Narang & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioners : Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior Advocate, with M/s Sanjay Dalmia and Tejasvi Dogra, Advocates, for respondents No.2 to 6.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-
“a. That a deterrent show cause notices seeking personal presence of all the contemnors may kindly be issued at extant occurrence. b. That further after perusing the material placed on record contemnor's may kindly be punished strictly in accordance with law for deliberately committing contempt of this Hon'ble Court, wilfully intentionally and consciously, having been dishonoured the orders dated: 28/11/2023, and 5/4/2024, passed CMPMO No. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:43695 656/2023 and order dated 7/8/2020, and judgment dated 28/9/2020, passed by this Hon'ble court in CMPMO No. 326/2020, willfully deliberately with chawkfull audacity having no respect qua the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court. c. That the contemnors thinking themselves to be above the law being head strong person may kindly be dealt with in accordance of law and justice may kindly be done to the applicants in the interest of justice and fair play by originating the present contempt proceedings and securing the rights of the parties to the lis.”
2. In light of the subsequent events which have taken place and in light of the unqualified and unconditional apology that stands tendered on behalf of the respondents for the inconvenience that was caused to the Court, by taking the said unqualified and unconditional apology on record, these proceedings are ordered to be closed. Notices stand discharged.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge December 15, 2025 (Rishi)