Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21787 WP NO.29288 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29288 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. N. SHILPA W/O LATE MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.
2.
MAST. HARASHAVARDHAN M.
S/O LATE MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS.
3.
MAST. AKASH M.
S/O LATE MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS
PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REP. BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, PETITIONER NO.1 - SMT. N. SHILPA.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT:
NO.27, DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK - 570 008. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR BEEDI, BENGALURU - 560 001.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21787 WP NO.29288 OF 2023
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU - 570 001.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU SUB-DIVISION, MYSURU - 570 001.
4.
THE THASILDAR MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU - 570 001.
5.
SRI. BASAVANNA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK - 570 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4;
SRI. H. SUNIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 05TH DECEMBER, 2023 PASSED IN R.P.NO.46/2022 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-C; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4-THASILDAR TO CONTINUE THE REVENUE ENTRIES JOINTLY IN THE NAME OF PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENT NO.5 IN RESPECT OF LAND IN QUESTION AS IT IS; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21787 WP NO.29288 OF 2023
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for petitioners has filed memo dated 18th June, 2025, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition, as the petitioners and the respondent No.5 in the petition have settled the matter by way of compromise in the pending suit.
2. The said memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9