Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35938 (PNJ)

MANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

CRM-M/16652/2024 · 2025-05-23

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16652-2024 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 MANDEEP SINGH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Advocate for the respondent. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present peon has been filed by the peoner for cancellaon of bail under Secon 439(2) Cr.P.C granted to respondent No.2 by this Court vide order dated 21.08.2023 passed in CRM-M-2410-2023 tled as 'Beant Kaur Vs. State of Punjab. 2. Counsel for the peoner seeks cancellaon of bail granted to respondent No.2 on the ground that she resiled from the se0lement based on which she was granted bail. 3. Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that she has no means to honour the se0lement and in compliance to the order dated 15.05.2025, counsel for respondent No.2 has voluntarily handed over her original affidavit menoning her assets, one copy to the peoner and one copy to the State. There is no need for this Court to keep any copy because declaraon of assets will not have bearing on the outcome. Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that affidavit has been voluntarily filed and she will not claim such declaration as any incrimination or violation of their rights under Articles 20/21 of the Constitution of India, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 or any other law in force. 4. Since, the respondent provided detail of her assets; as such, complainant is at liberty to take legal remedies in accordance with law for recovery of his amount, if any. This Court is not inclined to cancel the bail on the ground raised by petitioner. 4. There is no allegation of accused interfering in investigation or repeating the offence. Further, The reason not to cancel the bail further supported by the conduct of the accused in voluntarily declaring her assets. As such, no ground is made out to cancel the bail. 5. Given above, present petition is dismissed. All the pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 23.05.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.05.26 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document