- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20883 WP No. 33808 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.33808 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. S. JAYARAM S/O SUBRAMANYA MUDALIAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE JALA HOBALI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 560 094. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGAMESH G. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 094. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 094. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH BENGALURU - 560 094. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20883 WP No. 33808 of 2024 4. THE TAHASILDAR YALAHANKA BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 094. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REMOVE THE ENTRY MADE AT COLUMN NO.11 OF RTC AND TO CONDUCT SURVEY AND EFFECT DHARKAST PHODI AND ISSUE SEPARATE RTC IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY.NO. 28(28/P5) MEASURING 1 ACRE SITUATED AT KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK PURSUANT TO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE RRT/2/N/(A)CR/703/08-09 DATED 01.10.2015 VIDE ANNX-A; AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.10.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20883 WP No. 33808 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent to modify the entry in the RTC extracts and also conduct survey and effect dharakast phodi in respect of the subject land in terms of the order dated 01.10.2015 (Annexure-A) passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner for making entry in the revenue records in terms of the order dated 01.10.2015 (Annexure-A) passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, in accordance with law, within outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20883 WP No. 33808 of 2024 4. The respondent No.4 shall consider the claim made by the petitioner in accordance with law. In so far as the claim made by the petitioner vide representation dated 28.11.2024, seeking phody and durust, as per Annexure-D is concerned, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondent - authorities through online. If such online application is made by the petitioner, the respondent - authorities shall consider the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78