SMT RAJESH DEVI W/O SHRI SAMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/642/2019 · 2025-01-02
Avneesh Jhingan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35931 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35931 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:169] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 837/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.642/2019 Smt. Rajesh Devi W/o Shri Samar Singh, Resident Of Village Tasing, Tehsil Behrod, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Applicant Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through District Collector Alwar.
2. Chairman, Urban Improvement Trust, Bhiwadi, District Alwar.
3. Chairman, Nagar Palika, Behrod, District Alwar.
4. Commissioner And Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Behrod, District Alwar
5. Jile Singh Yadav, Ex Chairman, Nagar Palika, Behrod, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Applicant(s) : Mr.Anoop Agarwal for Mr.Hoshiyar Singh Arya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order 02/01/2025
1. An application No.426/2024 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the restoration application.
2. Application for condonation of delay is dismissed as infructuous as the restoration application is within time.
3. This application is filed for restoration of the writ petition. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated
26.07.2023.
[2025:RJ-JP:169] (2 of 2) [WRES-837/2024]
4. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and the writ petition be restored to its original number.
5. On request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is taken up on Board for hearing today itself.
In SBCWP No.642/2019:-
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length is not pressing the petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law as factual aspects need to be determined.
2. The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/57