IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2136 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Kumari Rajni …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Dhanvanti & Ms. Anuja Mehta, proxy counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record copy of office order dated 26.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Dy. Director of School Education (Elementary), Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Deputy Advocate General. Otherwise also, factum with regard to 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 compliance has been fairly acknowledged by learned proxy counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 10, 2025 (sunil)