1 2025:CGHC:34440 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8247 of 2025 1 - Surendra Tiwari S/o Late Bharat Tiwari Aged About 72 Years R/o Village - Bhaluhi, Post Office - Dihariya, District - Palamu (Jharkhand) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Engineer-In-Chief Water Resource Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Executive Engineer Water Resource Department, Division No. 2, Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - The Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Tahsil And District - Ambikapur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohitashva Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 21/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is retired employee of the respondents’ Departments and was working as Work Charged Contingency paid employee. It is further submitted that in light of judgment passed by this Court in WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel and others v. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, decided on 30.09.2022, present petitioner is also entitled for leave encashment. 2. Learned State counsel would submit that sufficient documents have not been filed by the petitioner, and it is also not reflected as to whether the petitioner has completed the minimum service to avail the benefit of leave encashment. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record. 4. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on merits of the case, this petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the concerned respondents/competent authority within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary documents to substantiate his claim. In that event, on due verification, if the petitioner is found to be similarly situated person, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra), his claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment passed in that 3 case expeditiously preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of submission of the said representation. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok