IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16810 of 2025 Decided on: 30th October, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kewal Krishan …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that though the respondents have conferred upon him retrospective work charge status under office order dated 03.09.2020 (Annexure P-1), however consequent pay fixation order has not been passed till date. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to pass appropriate pay fixation order in view of office order dated 03.09.2020 (Annexure P-1) conferring retrospective work charge status upon the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from today. The order so passed, be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 30, 2025 Judge R.Atal