1 2025:CGHC:36451 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3924 of 2025 1 - Ajeet Kumar Bhagat S/o Late Shri Jagti Ram Bhagat Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Dholnara, P.O. Kolam, Tahsil- Tamnar, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Ishwar Bhagat S/o Late Shri Jagti Ram Bhagat Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Dholnara, P.O. Kolam, Tahsil- Tamnar, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Raigarh Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gharghoda, Distt.- Gharghoda (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Tamnar Tahsil- Tamnar, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 28/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents particularly on the part of the respondent No. 2 & 3 who have not taken any decision upon the representation made by the petitioner with respect to forcefully starting the construction work in the petitioners’ land bearing Khasra No. 144 admeasuring 0.202 hectare, Khasra No. 145/1 admeasuring 0.053 hectare and Khasra No. 142 admeasuring Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.07.29 11:08:34 +0530 2 0.433 hectare total areas 0.688 hectare is situated at village Dholnara, PCN 14 Tahsil Tamnar District Raigarh, without acquiring the said land and without providing any compensation and rehabilitation to the petitioners, therefore he prays for a direction to the concerned authorities to decide his representation. 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending application/representation, she is having no objection to the limited prayer and if the claim of the petitioner is pending, it will be considered in accordance with law. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondent-authorities to consider/decide the pending representation of the petitioner on its own merits subject to verification of the facts and after demarcation of the land of the petitioner in the presence of all the concerned parties, in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not observed anything on the merits of the case. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti