Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35927 (PNJ)

SUNNY v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/15526/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-15526-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 275 CRM-M-15526-2025 Date of Decision: 07.07.2025 SUNNY ...Peoner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Sta-on Sec-ons 100 07.09.2022 Kathu Nangal, District Amritsar Rural 22, 25, 61, 85 of NDPS Act The peoner incarcerated in the FIR caponed above, has come up before this Court under Secon 483 BNSS seeking regular bail. 2. Custody cerficate dated 04.07.2025 filed by State counsel today in the Court is taken on record. 3. A:er arguing for some me, counsel for the peoner wants to withdraw the present peon with liberty to file a fresh peon a:er compleng one year of the sentence. 4. Given above, the present peon is disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is clarified that in case, State does not want to file fresh reply in the fresh peon and want to file the same reply as filed in the present peon, they shall be permi;ed to do so. Since peoner has already given power of a;orney to his counsel in this peon, as such, Registry shall not insist to file power of a;orney in case fresh peon is filed and power of a;orney filed in this peon shall suffice. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 07.07.2025 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2025.07.08 09:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.