Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35920 (RAJ)

TULCHARAM NEHRA SON OF CHHOKHARAM BANGADH v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/27367/2018 · 2025-03-04

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 27365/2018 Om Puri Son Of Gopal Puri, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Village Thathana Tehsil Kuchaman City District Nagaur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Tulcharam Nehra Son Of Chokharam Bangadh Post Chosla Nawa City District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Commerce And Industry New Delhi. 2. M/s Sambhar Salts Ltd., Through Its Chairman And Managing Director B-427 Pradhan Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Chairman And Managing Director, M/s Sambhar Salts Ltd., B 427 Pradhan Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 4. General Manager (Works), M/s Sambhar Salts Ltd, Sambhar Lake Sambhar District Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 27367/2018 Tulcharam Nehra Son Of Chhokharam Bangadh, Aged About 48 Years, Chosla Nawa City District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Commerce And Industry New Delhi. 2. M/s Sambhar Salts Ltd., Through Its Chairman And Managing Director B-427 Pradhan Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Chairman And Managing Director, M/s Sambhar Salts Ltd., B 427 Pradhan Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 4. General Manager (Works), M/s Sambhar Salts Ltd, Sambhar Lake Sambhar District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Alam Sahni for Mr. Anand Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 04/03/2025 1. It has been stated that with efflux of time, the relief prayed for in the writ petitions, has rendered infructuous, therefore, petitioners do not want to press these petitions. [2025:RJ-JP:9382] (2 of 2) [CW-27365/2018] 2. Respondents have no objection. 3. In view of above, instant writ petitions are dismissed as not press. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/65-66