R.ETTIKKAN v. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (Land acquisition)
CMP/7525/2025 · 2025-04-17
K Rajasekar, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35908 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35908 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP No. 7525 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CMP No. 7525 of 2025 and WA.No.2708 of 2024
1. R.Ettikkan S/o.Ramasamy, No.1/136-2, Vagurampatti, Vasanthapuram (PO), Namakkal Tk and Dt. Appellant(s) Vs
1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (Land acquisition) By-Pass Road, Namakkal 2.The Divisional Engineer National Highway, Salem 3.The Project Director National Highway Authority of India, Salem. Respondent(s) PRAYER To recall the order of this Court dated 03.03.2025 passed in W.A.No.2708 of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 7525 of 2025 2024 and rehear the said W.A.No.2708 of 2024 by giving due opportunity to the appellant to place his arguments in full relying upon the binding judgements of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): Mr.N.Subramaniyan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader For R1 and 2 Mr.Su.Srinivas For R3 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been instituted to recall the order of this Court 03.03.2025 passed in W.A.No.2708 of 2024, mainly on the ground that the judgment produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been considered by this Court. That apart, the other grounds raised by the petitioner was also not considered.
2. By filing a recall petition, the petitioner cannot attempt to re-argue the matter afresh and such an endeavour deserves no merit consideration. In the event of entertaining such nature of petition, litigations will never come to an end.
3. This Court, while passing an order formed an opinion and decided the issues. That being so, re-adjudications or re-consideration of the grounds afresh are impermissible. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present Petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 7525 of 2025
4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(K.RAJASEKAR J.) 17-04-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 7525 of 2025 To 1.THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (Land acquisition) By-Pass Road, Namakkal 2.The Divisional Engineer National Highway, Salem 3.The Project Director National Highway authority of India, Salem. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 7525 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.RAJASEKAR J. gd CMP No. 7525 of 2025
17-04-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis