[2025:RJ-JP:16821] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17314/2017 1. Ramesh Chand son of Shri Ladhuram, aged about 43 years, resident of Village Dabar Dumba, Village Panchayat Dabar Dumba, Panchayat Samiti Todaray Singh, District Tonk Raj. 2. Khem Chand Mali son of Shri Prem Lal Mali, resident of Village Dhada Moja Tan Darda Hind, District Tonk Raj. 3. Mannaram Mali son of Shri Heera Lal, resident of Village And Post Bhasu, Tehsil Todarai singh, District Tonk Raj. 4. Beena Kumari Daughter of Shri Rajesh Singh, aged about 26 years, resident of Village Jivansinghpura, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Raj. 2. Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayatraj Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Tonk, Raj. 5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar, Raj. 6. Block Elementary Education Officer, Todaraisingh, District Tonk Raj. 7. Block Elementary Education Officer, Mundawar, District Alwar Raj. 8. Principal/ Head Master cum Panchayat Elementary Education Officer (P.E.E.O.), Govt. Sr. Secondary School Dabaddumba, Tehsil Todarai Singh, District Tonk, Raj. 9. Principal/ Head Master cum Chief Elementary Education Officer (C.E.E.O.), Govt. Sr. Secondary School Samda, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumil Sharma on behalf of Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC [2025:RJ-JP:16821] (2 of 3) [CW-17314/2017] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/04/2025 1. The instant case was called twice today, however, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. I have examined the record of the writ petition as well as other document available on record. 3. The petitioners, in the instant writ petition, have prayed for a direction against the respondents to disclose the selection criteria while declaring the result of 'Gram Panchayat Sahayak' and consequently, to give appointment to the petitioners, if eligible and to restrain the respondents from inviting a new application for the post of 'Gram Panchayat Sahayak'. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents at the outset have stated that so far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, he has already given an appointment on the post of 'Gram Panchayat Sahayak'. 5. So far as petitioner Nos.2 & 3 are concerned, they could not secure sufficient marks and were quite lower in merit, hence, they were not appointed. 6. In reply to the writ petition, the respondents have also disclosed the selection criteria as well as the position of merit prepared by SDMC in following manner:- So far as other petitioners is concerned, it is submitted that complaints were received from the villagers that selection process adopted by the SDMC for selection of Panchayat Sahayak on 17.2.2017 was not transparent, severe irregularities, dishonesty was committed and selection was made airing provisions of the Rules. On the said complaint of the villagers A Committee was constituted at district level. The said Committee on the basis of Report of the Principal of the School observed that the selections were not [2025:RJ-JP:16821] (3 of 3) [CW-17314/2017] made transparently, cancelled the selection process dated 17.2.2017 and recommended for re-selection. In compliance of the aforesaid and also Government Order dated 16.5.2017, the SDMC again fixed norms for adopting selection process in its meeting dated 4.10.2017 and completed the selection process according to fixed norms. In the said meeting the selected three Gram Panchayat Sahayak and forwarded the same for approval to the District Level committee. The SDMC in its meeting has selected merit wise three Gram Panchayat Sahayakas as under:- Merit Name Marks I Ramesh Chand Kalal 25.2 II Govind Ram Sharma 18.4 III Ramlaxman Kumhar 16.5 It is submitted that petitioner No.1 Ramesh Chand Kalal positioned at No. ‘1’ in the Merit has been appointed and is presently working. It is relevant to mention here that Petitioner No.2 Khemchand Mali (13.7 Marks) and petitioner No.3 (16.2 Marks) being less meritorious candidates remained out of selection. 7. No rejoinder to the reply to writ petition has been filed to controvert the aforesaid submissions made in reply to the writ petition. 8. In view of above, the writ petition so far as it relates to petitioner No.1 is rendered infructuous on account of his appointment on the post of 'Gram Panchayat Sahayak' during the pendency of the writ petition and the writ petition filed by petitioner Nos.2 & 3 stands rejected. 9. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 10. Stay application as well as all pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/218