Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35902 (AP)

Smt. Bonu Vijayalakshmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30410/2024 · 2025-07-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010580512024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 30410/2024 Between: 1. SMT. BONU VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE BONU SATYANNARAYANA, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.1-2-44, RAMAPUR COLONY, PARVATHIPURAM, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT, PARVATHIPURAM 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARVATHIPURAM CIRCLE, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PARVATHIPURAM TOWN, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. 5. PINNINTI PARVATHI, W/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O PEDA DEVANGULAVEEDHI, PARVATHIPURAM, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT, 6. PINNINTI PRASAD BABU, S/O LATE APPARAO, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC EX. ARMY, R/O PEDA DEVANGULA VEEDHI, PARVATHIPURAM, PARVATHIPURAMMANYAM DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2 to 4 herein, in not providing the Police protection/Aid to the petitioner for implementing the decree of Interim injunction dt.21.02.2024 passed in O.S. No.33/2024 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge of Parvahtipuram in respect of property of an extent of Ac.111.11 Sq. Yrds in Sy.No.334/2D, Block No.27, Ward No.14, situated at Bypass Road, 2 Parvahtipuram Town, Parvathipuram Manyam District bounded by East - Vacant site of Valireddy Papi Naidu, South - Vacant site of Vendor Marisarla Karuna Kumari, West - Road, North - 15 feet road in spite of repeated representations of the petitioner as illegal, high-handed, arbitrary and failure on the part of the official respondents to exercise their powers apart from violation of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4, to grant police protection/aid to the petitioner and implement the decree of Interim injunction dt.21.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.107/2024 in O.S.No.33/2024 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge of Parvahtipuram in respect of property in subject and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.2 to 4 herein, in not providing the Police protection/Aid to the petitioner for implementing the decree of Interim injunction dt.21.02.2024 passed in O.S. No.33/2024 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge of Parvahtipuram in respect of property of an extent of Ac.111.11 Sq. Yrds in Sy.No.334/2D, Block No.27, Ward No.14, situated at Bypass Road, Parvahtipuram Town, Parvathipuram Manyam District bounded by East -Vacant site of Valireddy Papi Naidu, South - Vacant site of Vendor Marisarla Karuna Kumari, West - Road, North - 15 feet road in spite of repeated representations of the petitioner as illegal, high-handed, arbitrary and failure on the part of the official respondents to exercise their powers apart from violation of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4, to grant police protection/aid to the petitioner and implement the decree of Interim injunction dt.21.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.107/2024 in O.S.No.33/2024 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge of Parvahtipuram in respect of property in subject and pass such ...” 3 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent/Police. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner has filed a suit in OS No.33 of 2024 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Parvathipuram against respondents 5 and 6 seeking an injunction not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property. Trial Court granted an ad-interim injunction in IA No.107/2024 in OS No.33/2024 on 21.02.2024. Learned counsel would submit that Petitioner gave a police complaint to the Police to provide police aid against the respondents 5 and 6 but till date, police did not take any action on that complaint. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the subject matter pertains to civil in nature, respondent Police could not provide police protection to the Petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to work out her remedy before appropriate forum having jurisdiction according to law. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 30410 of 2024 22.07.2025 Mjl /*