ARJUN VASUDEV TALWANEKAR AND 3 ORS v. SITABAI SHANTARAM TALWANEKAR AND ANR
MCA/495/2024 · 2025-06-13
Shri Valmiki Menezes
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35900 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35900 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
MCA 495 of 2024 Sonam IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.495 OF 2024 ARJUN VASUDEV TALWANEKAR AND 3 ORS ... APPLICANTS Versus SITABAI SHANTARAM TALWANEKAR AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS Mr. Abhijit Pramod Gosavi, Advocate for Applicants. Ms. Maria Viegas, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED :- 13th June, 2025 P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate Ms. Maria Viegas puts in appearance for the Respondents.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
3. The application is vehemently objected submitting that grounds have not been made out for condoning the delay.
4. The Respondent has further objected on the ground that the medical reasons assigned for condoning the delay are attributable only to one of the Applicants/Appellants, while others were available to file 13th June, 2025
MCA 495 of 2024 the Appeal.
5. The application is supported by medical records of the Applicant who has filed the application. The application is also supported by an affidavit. These averments are otherwise not seriously controverted by the Respondents.
6. Considering these facts, the delay can be termed as reasonable and sufficiently explained. Consequently, the application is allowed and the delay of 38 days is condoned.
7. The application stands disposed of.
VALMIKI MENEZES, J. 13th June, 2025