Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3590 (JHR)

SUJIT KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SUJIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./480/2025 · 2025-01-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.480 of 2025 ------ Sujit Kumar Yadav @ Sujit Kumar, Aged about- 25 years, S/o – Chandrika Mahto, R/o Village – Jagdishpur, P.O.- Pihra, P.S.- Gawan, District- Giridih .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dulari Devi, W/O Niranjan Prasad Yadav, R/o Village- Jagdishpur, P.O.- Pihra, P.S.- Gawan, District- Giridih .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1482 of 2023 instituted under Sections 147, 452, 323, 354- B, 506, 379, 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, outraged the modesty of the complainant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that because of land dispute between the parties, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and he further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.- 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Complaint Case No.1482 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/