- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5751 CRL.A No. 2395 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2395 OF 2023 (A) BETWEEN: SMT. VANAJA W/O NANJUNDASWAMY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO 1345/A, 1ST CROSS (PURNA DRUSHTI ROAD) KUVEMPUNAGAR MYSORE-570 023 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABUBACKER SHAFI, ADVOCATE - [ABSENT]) AND: KESHAVAIAH S/O CHIKKA MADAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.19, 3RD CROSS KRISHNAPPA SHARADAMMA BUILDING (BESIDE ABIJITH BANDAR STORES) RAGHAVENDRA NAGARA MYSURU-570 011 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. GOVIND BHARATH M.V, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ABOVE SAID JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED 19.08.2023 PASSED IN CRL.CASE NO.898/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE J.M.F.C IV COURT MYSURU BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE CRL.A AND CONVICT AND Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5751 CRL.A No. 2395 of 2023 SENTENCE THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED FOR THE ABOVE SAID OFFENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation for the appellant. The matter is listed today for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. On 08.11.2024, this Court has passed the following order: "Learned counsel for the appellant again prays for a week’s time to comply with the office objections. The petition is of the year 2023. The matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, as a last chance, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. List this matter after one week. " - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5751 CRL.A No. 2395 of 2023 2. Inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the appellant has not complied the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11