2025:HHC:36098 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.410 of 2019 Decided on:29.10.2025 __________________________________________________________ Rustam Singh & Others ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioners: Mr. Raman Jamalta and Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 & 2-State. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Om Pal, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4. Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] De-linked from CWPOA No.943 of 2019. 2. Vide order dated 06.12.2024 and subsequent orders dated 16.12.2024, which were reiterated on various occasions till 11.08.2025, Learned Counsel(s) were directed to have instructions as to whether the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:36098 - 2 - claim still survives or not and whether the petitioners intend to continue with the present proceedings. 3. Upon listing of the matter today, Mr. Raman Jamalta, Learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that despite various efforts, the petitioners are not coming forth to impart instructions as referred to above. He, therefore, pleads no instructions on behalf of the petitioners. [Statement Taken on Record]. 4. Accordingly, for want of instructions, the instant matter is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order dated 22.09.2010, as extended shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, including CMP(T) Nos.1228, 1229 and 1230 of 2020, shall also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 07, 2025 [Shivender]