Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35882 (JHR)

Sonu Ansari And Ors v. The State Of Jharkhand And Anr

Cr.M.P./2398/2016 · 2025-12-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:35883] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2398 of 2016 ------ 1. Sonu Ansari, son of Hasib Ansari, 2. Talib Ansari, son of Late Mazid Ansari, 3. Sohrab Ansari, son of Talib Ansari, 4. Boby Ansari, son of Talib Ansari, 5. Lukman Ansari, son of Late Mazid Ansari 6. Enamul Ansari, son of Yunus Ansari, 7. Md. Yunus, son of Chaman Ansari 8. Zyaul Haque, son of Enul Ansari 9. Ekramul, son of Yunus Ansari All are residents of Village- Sirat Nagar, Neori, P.O.- Vikash, P.S.- Sadar (Mesra), District- Ranchi. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nuresha Khatoon, wife of Md. Sabir Ansari, resident of Village- Piparchoura, Sirat Nagar, P.O.- Vikash, P.S.- Sadar (Mesra), District- Ranchi … Opposite Parties With Cr.M.P. No.440 of 2017 ------ 1. Md. Pervez Ansari @ Parvez Ansari son of Majlum Ansari; 2. Md. Tamzeer Ansari @ Tamzeer Ansari son of Majlum Ansari 3. Md. Emteyaz Ansari, son of Meyazan Ansari 4. Faiyaz Ansari @ Md. Faiyaz Ansari; son of Md. Kudrat Ansari 5. Reyaz Ansari, son of Md. Kudrat Ansari; 6. Md. Sarfaraz Ansari @ Sarfaraz Ansari; son of Md. Mukhtar Ansari; 7. Md. Ashfaque Ansari @ Asfaque Ansari, son of Md. Mukhtar Ansari; All are residents of Village- Neori, P.O.- Vikash, P.S.- Sadar (Mesra T.O.P.), District- Ranchi … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nuresha Khatoon, wife of Md. Sabir Ansari, resident of Village- Piparchoura, Sirat Nagar, P.O.- Vikash, P.S.- Sadar (Mesra), District- Ranchi … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate Mr. Vikesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P. Ms. Lily Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:-10 Dated:-01-12-2025 Heard parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners of Cr.M.P. No.2398 of 2016 files the Supplementary Affidavit, the copy of which has been served upon the other party. Let the same be kept in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions with liberty to raise all the grounds taken in these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions before the appropriate court at the appropriate stage. Permission is accorded. These Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stand dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 01.12.2025-Animesh/