IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116 BABIL BAN AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Varsha Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance official respondents the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to dated 15.03.2025 (Annexure P 2. It is submitted by th petitioner No.1 is already married with respondent No.7 but living separately. Both the petitioners are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 15.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been tak consideration and hence, the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: BABIL BAN AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Varsha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 7 and take action on dated 15.03.2025 (Annexure P-3). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.1 is already married with respondent No.7 but living separately. Both the petitioners are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 15.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been tak consideration and hence, the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2733 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation e learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.1 is already married with respondent No.7 but living separately. Both the petitioners are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 15.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into of the the at their representation e learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.1 is already married with respondent No.7 but living separately. Both the petitioners are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation en into Jyoti 2025.03.21 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2733 of 2025 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petit 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and relationship as veracity of the averments sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 Kurukshetra to look into the matter and dispose 15.03.2025 (Annexure P step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 15.03.2025 (Annexure P do the needful expeditiously. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. 20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2733 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-The Superintendent of Police, District Kurukshetra to look into the matter and dispose 15.03.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated .2025 (Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2733 of 2025 -2- Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is ion to him. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned going into the question of legality of their well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of The Superintendent of Police, District Kurukshetra to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 3) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned going into the question of legality of their well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of The Superintendent of Police, District of the representation dated 3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 3) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the Jyoti 2025.03.21 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document