Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35872 (RAJ)

TRILOK CHAND S/O NAROTTAM DAS B/C JATAV v. GUDDI DEVI W/O TRILOK CHAND D/O SHRI RAM DAYAL B/C JATAV

CRLR/33/2020 · 2025-04-02

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14721] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 33/2020 Trilok Chand S/o Narottam Das, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Subhash Nagar, 60 Ft. Road, Alwar Police Station N.E.B. Alwar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus Smt. Guddi Devi W/o Trilok Chand D/o Shri Ram Dayal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o New Basti Diwakari Ambedkar School Ke Paas, Alwar, Police Station N.E.B. Alwar Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheem Sain Bairwa, Adv. For Respondent(s) : - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 02/04/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition on the ground that parties have settled their dispute amicably, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. He also submits that in compliance of the order dated 08.01.2020 passed by this Court, petitioner has deposited demand draft of Rs.11,000/- as litigation expenses in favour of the respondent. He further submits that as the matter has been settled between the parties and no-one has appeared on behalf of the respondent, therefore, the demand draft of Rs.11,000/- deposited by the petitioner be returned. 2. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. [2025:RJ-JP:14721] (2 of 2) [CRLR-33/2020] 3. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 4. Office is directed to return the demand draft of Rs.11,000/- deposited by the petitioner. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /80