Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:36319
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1147 of 2025 1 - Smt. Roshni Mehar D/o Kamaladani @ Kamalkant Mehar, W/o Vijay Kumar Vastrakar Aged About 25 Years Resident Of Village And Post - Bojiya, Police Station - Chhal, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Vijay Kumar Vastrakar S/o Ramavtar Vastrakar Aged About 34 Years Resident Of Village And Post - Bojiya, Police Station - Chhal, District Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Harish Duhan The Chairman-Cum-Managing Director S.E.C.L., Seepat Road, Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Anirudh Singh The General Manager, S.E.C.L. Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Amitesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Order on Board 25.07.2025
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that petitioners have submitted their representation on 25.07.2024 along with certified copy of order passed by this Court on 11.07.2024 for its compliance, and twice notices have also been issued to submit necessary documents, and despite making an application, or taking time to file the necessary documents, they have not filed the same before the authorities concerned, and ultimately, the authorities have decided the representation vide order dated 23.07.2025, and thereby, order dated 11.07.2024 passed in WPS-3812 of 2024 is complied Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.28 10:41:14 +0530
Cont 1147 of 2025 2 with. In support of his submission, he filed copy of notices issued to the petitioners, and order dated 23.07.2025, which are being taken on record.
2. On due consideration of submission by learned counsel for the respondents that the order of contempt has already been complied with vide
order dated 23.07.2025, after giving opportunity to the petitioners, present contempt petition stands disposed of. Petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate remedy against the order, if they so desire. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma