Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35861 (RAJ)

J. K. DHINGRA S/O SHRI M.L. DHINGRA v. STATE THE SECRETARY

CW/26960/2018 · 2025-02-17

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6956] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26960/2018 J. K. Dhingra S/o Shri M.l. Dhingra, Aged About 73 Years, House No. 7-D-18 Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State The Secretary, Local Self Government, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Mayor, Nagar Nigam Jaipur 4. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Moti Dungari Zone, Ghatgate, In Front Of Sofia School, Jaipur. 5. Shri Jayanti Bhai Patel S/o Shri Harilal Patel, Aged About 75 Years, R/o 7-D-17, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Singh Rana for Mr. R. P. Garg For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonal Singh for Mr. Alok Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/02/2025 1. Petitioner preferred instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India way back on 29.11.2018, raising an issue that in the residential House No.7-D-17 situated at Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur, private respondent No.5-Sh. Jayanti Bhai Patel has started commercial activity, hence such commercial activity be directed to be stopped immediately. [2025:RJ-JP:6956] (2 of 2) [CW-26960/2018] 2. After filing of writ petition, petitioner has not affected service on respondent No.5 and has not produced any material that commercial activity is still going on in the premises in question. 3. In that view, proceedings of instant writ petition are closed at this stage with the liberty to petitioner to take appropriate legal remedy afresh, in case, his grievance survives or a fresh cause of action arises. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/62