TAMIL DEVA POWER SOLUTION v. The ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
WP/9534/2025 · 2025-03-20
Krishnan Ramasamy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35861 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35861 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 9534 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 9534 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 10694 OF 2025 Tamil Deva Power Solution Represented By Its Proprietor, Ramalingam Vasudevan, No.3/244, Ragava Nagar, 3rd Main Road, Madipakkam, Chennai - 600091. Petitioner(s) Vs The ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, Madipakkam Assessment Circle Tambaram Zone, Chengalpattu Division. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for an issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the respondent
order dated 09.02.2024 in Reference Number ZA330224052384W and quash https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 the same and consequently direct the respondents to revoke the cancellation of the GST registration of the petitioner firm. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P. Suresh Babu For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate (t)
ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by the respondent, cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to ill- health and financial constraints, the petitioner had not filed the GST returns continuously for a period of six months. Under these circumstances, the GST Registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide order dated
09.02.2024. 3.Further, he would submit that the petitioner is willing to file his GST returns and pay the entire tax liabilities along with applicable interest and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 penalty, if any. Hence, he requests this Court to revoke the order passed by the respondent for cancellation of GST Registration of the petitioner. 4.In reply, the learned Government Advocate for the respondent confirms that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide impugned order dated 09.02.2024 and requests this Court to pass an appropriate
order. 5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record. 6.In this case, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent vide the impugned order dated 09.02.2024. According to the petitioner, due to ill-health and financial constraints, he was unable to file his returns continuously for a period of six months. The reason provided for non- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 compliance with the relevant provisions of the Act within the prescribed time, in the considered opinion of this Court, appears to be genuine. 7.In view of the above, this Court is inclined to revoke the impugned
order passed by the respondent canceling the GST registration of the petitioner. The cancellation of registration is hereby revoked, subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions: (i) The respondent shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (ii) The petitioner is directed to file returns for the period till date, if not filed, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of 4 weeks from the date of restoration of GST Registration of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 (iii) It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine/fee etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit (ITC) which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. (iv) If any ITC has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department. (v) Only such approved ITC shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. (vi) If any ITC was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondent or any other competent authority. (vii) If any of the aforesaid conditions is not complied with by the petitioner, the benefit granted under this order will automatically ceased to operate. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 8.With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 20-03-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 To The ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, Madipakkam Assessment Circle Tambaram Zone, Chengalpattu Division. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9534 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 9534 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 10694 OF 2025 20-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis