Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35861 (AP)

G.VENKATESWARLU, C.S.PURAM MANDAL,PRAKASAM & ANOTHER v. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, OF DPEP/SSA,..HYDERABAD & 3 OTHE

WP/23301/2006 · 2025-08-10

Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010578752006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.23301 OF 2006 Between: 1. G.Venkateswarlu, S/o.Channaiah, aged about 39 years, Occ: M.R.P., C.S.Puram Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. K.Ravi Kumar, S/o.Isaiah, aged about 34 years, Occ: M.R.P., C.S.Puram Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State Project Director of DPEP/SSA, O/o.Commissioner & Director of School Education, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2. The District Educational Officer-cum- Project Coordinator, DPEP/SSA, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Additional Project Coordinator DPEP/SSA, Prakasam District at Ongole. 4. The Mandal Educational Officer, C.S.Puram Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.Kurra Srinivas Counsel for the Respondents: The G.P. for Services II 2 WP_23301_2006 The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble NJS,J) At the time of considering the matter, Mr.Dheera Kanisha, learned Advocate representing the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ______________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J August 11, 2025 vasu