IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 114 NAVJOT AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Ramandeep Kaur Mr. Varinder Basa, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 17.03.202525 ( 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner 17.03.2025 before the raising their grievances as not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: NAVJOT AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Varinder Basa, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7 and to take action on 202525 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Commissioner of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Commissioner decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2708 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Ludhiana (Annexure P-5) in the present petition but the same has been taken thereon. He further would be satisfied if appropriate Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on ) petition but the same has further satisfied if appropriate Ludhiana and take Jyoti 2025.03.21 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2708 of 2025 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana Court, has accepted the notice that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2708 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 17.03.2025(Annexure P- 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2708 of 2025 -2- Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana, who is present in on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid -5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.03.21 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document