Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35856 (PNJ)

SATWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/17563/2025 · 2025-05-05

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-17563-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.117 CRM-M-17563-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 05.05.2025 Satwinder Kaur ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Veer Vikram Singh Mann, Advocate for the petitioner Through video conferencing. Ms. Guramrit Kaur, DAG, Punjab. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed seeking direction to the official respondents No.1 to 3 for conducting fair and impartial investigation in FIR No.290 dated 11.12.2024, under Sections 76, 115(s) & 190 of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab. 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel while placing reliance upon the affidavit dated 22.04.2025 filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Tanda, District Hoshiarpur on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, submits that in the present case, respondent No.5, namely Kuldeep Kaur was arrested on 10.04.2025. Thereafter, the police of Tanda, District Hoshiarpur has been continuously conducted raids at the residential houses of respondents No.4, 6 to 9 to arrest them. He has further submitted that out of a total of 06 accused, 03 have been arrested. Moreover, duty officer as also PCR Official Unit, Tanda have been instructed to maintain Ramandeep Singh 2025.05.06 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-17563-2025 (O&M) 2 vigilance over the residential house of the petitioner to ensure the safety and protection of the petitioner and her family members. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the facts mentioned in the affidavit and submissions made by learned State counsel. 4. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 05.05.2025 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ramandeep Singh 2025.05.06 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document