IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 2530 of 2025 Decided on: 12.12.2025 Rajinder Kumar …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathni, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Notice. Mr. Rahul, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks enforcement of Rajinder Kumar versus H.R.T.C and others.2 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the respondents placed on record copy of office order dated 11.12.2025 and on that basis, submits that case of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. 4. Taking note of the aforesaid order passed by the respondents, the present execution petition stands disposed of. It is 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWP No.10262/2025, decided on 26.06.2025 2 for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for rederessal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 12, 2025 (yogesh)