Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3585 (UTT)

SHRI BABA SHYAM STONE CRUSHER PVT LTD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMB/65/2025 · 2025-03-12

Ashish Naithani, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1754-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE MR. G. NARENDAR, C.J. HON’BLE MR. ASHISH NAITHANI, J Writ Petition (M/B) No.65 of 2025 Shri Baba Shyam Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …Respondents Presence:- Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. JUDGMENT :(per HON’BLE MR. G. NARENDAR, C.J.) Heard Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition was preferred mounting a challenge to the show cause notice issued by the respondents calling upon the petitioner to demonstrate as to why the GST Registration ought not to be cancelled. Aggrieved he preferred the instant writ petition and that in the interregnum, the authorities have suo moto revoked the show cause notice and thereby the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. Submission is placed on record. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. G. NARENDAR, C.J. ASHISH NAITHANI, J. Dt:12th March, 2025 Arti 1