Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35849 (KAR)

SRI. MOHAMMED HAAKIMUDDIN v. SMT.ROSHINI KOUSAR FATHIMA

WP/33077/2024 · 2025-07-02

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23582 WP No. 33077 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 33077 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMED HAAKIMUDDIN S/O MOHAMMED IQBAL AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/A NO.183, RABIA MANSION FLAT NO. 5 AND 6 2ND FLOOR, LALBAGH ROAD 4TH CROSS, K.S. GARDEN BENGALURU-560 027 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.ONKARA K.B., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.ROSHINI KOUSAR FATHIMA W/O MOHAMMED HAAKIMUDDIN AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS NO.21, 1ST FLOOR, SMS LAYOUT 18TH MAIN, JP NAGAR 5TH PHASE BENGALURU-560 078 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.MOHAMMED ISHALUDDIN Z., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 05.10.2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT V IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO. 162/2022 ON I.A.NO.1 AGAINST THE PETITIONER DIRECTING TO PAY THE MAINTENANCE AMOUNT OF RS. 17000/- PER MONTH TO THE RESPONDENT/WIFE ONLY. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23582 WP No. 33077 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw as it is the order passed by the Magistrate, they have to go before the District Court and instead of that they have come before this court. 2. The learned counsel appearing to the respondent submits that against the very same impugned order, the wife had filed WP.No.14474/2024 and this court has set aside the matter and remanded the matter to the trial court and the husband is also contesting the said matter. When once the order that is passed by the trial court is set aside, there is no question of granting liberty. In the light of the order passed in WP No.14474/2024, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23582 WP No. 33077 of 2024 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 4. All pending I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4