IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 128 of 2025 Date of Decision: 7.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Neha Dubey ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms.Ranjana Pathania, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record copy of office order dated 4.11.2025, issued under the signature of Director of Horticulture, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, stands complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid order, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of the learned Additional Advocate General, which fact has been further acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of judgment sought to be executed. November 7, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge