SUSHIL SARDAR v. SANKAR GHOSH THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AND ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONWE
CPAN/1360/2025 · 2025-09-12
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35843 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35843 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
12.09.2025
Ct. No. 30
S.L No. 21 MKP CPAN 1360 of 2025 In WPA 29485 of 2024
Sushil Sardar
Vs
Sankar Ghosh The Controlling Authority And Assistant Labour Commissioner
Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta Mr. Anath Nath Naskar Mr. Saikat Sutradhar Ms. Sagarika Goswami Ms. Suryatapa Das
……for the Petitioner
Ms. Amrita Pandey Ms. Sneha Singh ………..for the Respondent
Affidavit of service filed be kept with record. Learned Counsel for the alleged contemnor is appearing in person. On hearing the Learned Counsel for the petitioner and the alleged contemnor, it appears that it is the order dated 30.01.2025 of which violation has been alleged. Vide the said order this Court has directed the Controlling Authority to proceed in respect of it’s order.
2 The alleged contemnor has appeared before this Court and it appears that on 03.04.2025, the Controlling Authority has issued a certificate to the Certificate Officer, South 24-Parganas. The matter is now to be proceeded with by the Certificate Officer. It appears that the contempt application has been filed on 05.08.2025, whereas the certificate has already been issued on
03.04.2025. The contempt application thus has no merit as there has been no violation of the order of this Court as alleged. Accordingly contempt application stands dismissed. The Controlling Authority’s presence is dispensed with. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
[Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]