APHC010577132022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: Donka Chandrasekhar and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 48 Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to quash the C.C.No.348 of 2021 on the file Principal Junior Civil Judge Court at Srikakulam against the petitioners herein. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8465/2022 Donka Chandrasekhar and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of 1973 has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused 1 and 2 seeking to quash the C.C.No.348 of 2021 on the file Principal Junior Civil Judge Court at Srikakulam against the petitioners IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) of the Code of 1973 has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused 1 and 2 seeking to quash the C.C.No.348 of 2021 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge Court at Srikakulam against the petitioners 2 2. Heard Sri Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court. 4. As seen, counter case also has been filed on the respondent No.2 and her family members basing on the complaint made by the accused No.1. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 6. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material placed on record, the petition is disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. It is left open to the petitioners to raise all their contentions before the Trial Court in their defence, learned Trial Judge may appreciate them according to law and dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the presence of the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 before the Trial Court is 3 dispensed with unless their presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. 8. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Dt.03.01.2025 Pnr 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8465 of 2022 Dated 03.01.2025 Pnr