Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35839 (RAJ)

RAVI SONANIA S/O RAJENDRA KUMAR SONANIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/5/2025 · 2025-02-05

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5047] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 5/2025 Ravi Sonania S/o Rajendra Kumar Sonania, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 6/82, Hari Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Excise Commissioner, Jaipur City, Malviya Nagar, Excise Department, Rajasthan. 3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 5. Investigating Officer Of Fir No. 0373/2024, P.s. Jawahar Circle, Distt. Jaipur City (East) Raj. 6. Code Black, Jaipur, R/o D-Block, Kalyan Colony, D-Block, Sector- 4, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur Through Its Owner Shivam Verma . ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/02/2025 1. This criminal writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking fair and impartial investigation in FIR No.373/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 4A & 21A of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Amendment Act, 2019. [2025:RJ-JP:5047] (2 of 2) [CRLW-5/2025] 2. During the course of arguments, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that after thorough investigation in the matter, the Police has submitted charge-sheet against the accused therein for the aforementioned offences on 23.12.2024 before the concerned Magistrate. 3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted against the accused persons for the alleged offences, no further cause of action survives with the petitioner. 4. The present criminal writ petition is disposed of accordingly as having become infructuous. 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Satyendra/106