APHC010576932012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 164/2012 Between: 1. M.BHASKAR REDDY, S/O NARASA REDDY RETD. SECRETARY, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., PILER, R/O DR.NO.20187, NEAR RTO OFFICE, KADAPA ROAD, PILER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. P MAQBOOL KHAN, PRESIDENT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, CHINNAGOTIGALLU VILLAGE & MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. REDDESHWAR REDDY, S/O SRI SIDDARAMI REDDY, PRESIDENT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, PULICHERLA VILLAGE & MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents herein for willful disobeying the orders dated 13.06.2011 passed in WP No.27842 of 2005 by not paying the arrears of salary to me and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 374 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SRS,J C.C.No.164 of 2012 permit the petitioner to substitute the name of the first respondent from P.Maqbool Khan as T.Prasad and the name of the second respondent from Reddeshwar Reddy as A.Shyam Prasad Reddy as persons incharge of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies, Chinnagottigallu and pulicherla Village, respectively and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(APPL 833 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to substitute the name of the first respondent from T.Prasad to V.K.Venugopala Krishna as person incharge of the primary agricultural Cooperative Society, Chinnagottigallu, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 1210 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to substitutre the name of the first respondent from T. Prasad as M. Prabhakar, being the person incharge of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies, Chinnagottigallu and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI 2. N BHARAT BABU 3. V NITESH The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 13.06.2011 in W.P.No.27842 of 2005. Page 3 of 5 SRS,J C.C.No.164 of 2012 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. W.P.No.27842 of 2005 was filed to declare the action of respondents in not paying salary to the petitioner from 01.11.2002 to 18.01.2005. The writ petition was disposed of on 13.06.2011, directing the respondents to consider and finalize the claim of the petitioner by passing an appropriate order, as per law, within two (02) months, from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 4. In the affidavit, it was pleaded that despite communicating the order dated 13.06.2011 to the respondents, the respondent authorities failed to pay the salary. 5. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent No.1. It was contended, inter-alia, that the authority requested the petitioner to produce the required documents and claim the amount. The petitioner, neither came to the office nor produced the documents. A legal notice dated 11.10.2012 was issued to the petitioner asking him to come to the office and show the required documents. However, the petitioner did not turn up. 6. Respondent No.2 filed a counter affidavit by annexing the proceedings dated 20.11.2011, wherein, it was stated that the petitioner is entitled to an amount of Rs.91,750/-, in total. The petitioner, in fact, obtained a loan for Rs.61,000/- and the balance amount of Rs.30,750/- will be paid to the petitioner. 7. A reply affidavit filed by the petitioner by denying the averments made in the counter affidavits filed by respondents 1 & 2. 8. Thus, as seen from the counter affidavits filed by respondents 1 & 2, the order dated 13.06.2011 in W.P.No.27842 of 2005, has been complied with. The complaint of the petitioner that the order has not been complied with, is no merit consideration. Page 4 of 5 SRS,J C.C.No.164 of 2012 9. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 04.03.2025 TVN SRS,J C.C.No.164 of 2012 162 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.164 OF 2012 Date : 04.03.2025 TVN